Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:10:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:09:32 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:43157 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:09:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: time() glitch on 2.4.18: solved From: Alan Cox To: Jim Paris Cc: Willy Tarreau , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021105130222.A6245@neurosis.mit.edu> References: <20021102013704.A24684@neurosis.mit.edu> <20021103143216.A27147@neurosis.mit.edu> <1036355418.30679.28.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021105113020.A5210@neurosis.mit.edu> <20021105171035.GB879@alpha.home.local> <1036520191.5012.109.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021105130222.A6245@neurosis.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 05 Nov 2002 18:37:57 +0000 Message-Id: <1036521477.4827.118.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 797 Lines: 22 On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:02, Jim Paris wrote: > > > > + if (count > LATCH) { > > > > > > may be (count >= LATCH) would be even better ? > > > > Some PIT clones seem to hold the LATCH value momentarily judging by > > other things that were triggered wrongly by >= > > If so, then that's a separate problem: the later code > > count = ((LATCH-1) - count) * TICK_SIZE; > delay_at_last_interrupt = (count + LATCH/2) / LATCH; > It might be interesting to catch that case with a printk too and put both in 2.5 and see what comes out in the wash yes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/