Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:10:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:09:29 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:42389 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:08:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: What's left over. From: Alan Cox To: Werner Almesberger Cc: Suparna Bhattacharya , Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , "Matt D. Robinson" , Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20021105150048.H1408@almesberger.net> References: <3DC19A4C.40908@pobox.com> <20021031193705.C2599@almesberger.net> <20021105171230.A11443@in.ibm.com> <20021105150048.H1408@almesberger.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 05 Nov 2002 18:36:00 +0000 Message-Id: <1036521360.5012.116.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 641 Lines: 14 On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:00, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Yes, I've just checked with Eric, and he hasn't received any > indication from Linus so far. I posted a reminder to linux-kernel. > I'd really hate to see kexec miss 2.6. Let me ask the same dumb question - what does kexec need that a dumper doesn't. In other words given reboot/trap hooks can kexec happily live as a standalone module ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/