Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:47:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:47:31 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:55701 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:47:30 -0500 Subject: Re: PATCH: Driver Maintainers From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Marcelo Tosatti In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 05 Nov 2002 20:16:14 +0000 Message-Id: <1036527374.6750.22.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 980 Lines: 24 On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 18:43, Linus Torvalds wrote: > to remove potential problematic entries from already-released kernels? In > other words, wouldn't it be better to have some nice place on the web and > a pointer to that in the kernel sources? Fair comment. I can happily put it on a web site with a pointer instead any preferences to a location like kernel.org or just 'wherever' Splitting it up by company is easy enough to do - split the web page into "Interested in contracts below $1000, $10000, $100000, $1M, ..." sections One could construct a verifiable non-repuditable rating scheme I guess. That depends if its worth it "People who paid for bug fixes in the 3c501 driver also bought MacIIfx support contracts..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/