Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:52:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:52:56 -0500 Received: from ip68-105-128-224.tc.ph.cox.net ([68.105.128.224]:48311 "EHLO Bill-The-Cat.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:52:55 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 12:56:16 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Rob Landley , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: CONFIG_TINY Message-ID: <20021105195616.GF13102@opus.bloom.county> References: <20021104195144.GC27298@opus.bloom.county> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 24 On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:26:08PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 02:13:48AM +0000, Rob Landley wrote: > > > > I've used -Os. I've compiled dozens and dozens of packages with -Os. It has > > > always saved at least a few bytes, I have yet to see it make something > > > larger. And in the benchmarks I've done, the smaller code actually runs > > > slightly faster. More of it fits in cache, you know. > > > > Then we don't we always use -Os? > [snip 6 good reasons] So why do we want to force it on for CONFIG_TINY? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/