Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:16:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:16:33 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:40949 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:16:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:15:30 -0200 (BRDT) From: Rik van Riel To: LA Walsh cc: Delta , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: System unresponsitive when copying HD/HD In-Reply-To: <3A7C64F9.F3192611@sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, LA Walsh wrote: > I've noticed less responsive disk response on 2.4.0 vs. 2.2.17. > For example -- I run vmware and suspend it frequently when I'm > not using it. One of them requires a 158Mb save file. Before, > I could suspend that one, then start another which reads in a > smaller 50M save file. The smaller one would come up while the > other was still saving. As of 2.4, the smaller one doesn't come > up -- I can't even do an 'ls' until the big save finishes. [snip] This could be related with (from the linux-mm bugzilla): http://distro.conectiva.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1178 I have a patch against 2.4.1 and 2.4.1-ac which {c,sh}ould fix this bug, but I don't know if it will fix your situation. If your problem still happens with this patch, let me know and I'll see how I can fix it: http://www.surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.1-vmpatch regards, Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/