Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754757AbaBSS07 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:26:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:51733 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754532AbaBSS06 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:26:58 -0500 Message-ID: <5304F76C.1070500@intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:26:52 -0800 From: Dirk Brandewie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dirk Brandewie CC: dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX References: <1392228067-14817-1-git-send-email-dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> <1862084.mmnlZ4yS6m@vostro.rjw.lan> <5303FC4E.7040305@gmail.com> <2254366.ixXkMqbYNC@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <2254366.ixXkMqbYNC@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/18/2014 04:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 04:35:26 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >> On 02/18/2014 04:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 04:24:02 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:53:48 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >>>>>> On 02/18/2014 02:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Rafael, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> From: Dirk Brandewie > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Based on v3.14-rc2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi >>>>>>>>> intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be >>>>> dropped. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I asked you about them, but you didn't reply: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If not, I can queue them up for -rc4. >>>>>> >>>>>> All the patches are independent of one another. >>>>>> >>>>>> Patch 2 is straight cleanup no functional change but reduces the memory >>>>>> footprint slightly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Patch 3 is a bug that will only be seen when the PID is reset at init >>>>> time >>>>>> or when a change is made to PID params via debugfs. The problem will >>>>> only >>>>>> exist for one sample time since it is setting last_err in the PID. >>>>>> >>>>>> Patch 4-5 are bugs found during Baytrail-T testing >>>>> >>>>> Are there any pointers to bug reports that may be included in the >>>>> changelogs >>>>> of these? >>>> >>>> >>>> No. I got the reports via email. I could probably get the reporters to >>>> file bugzillas. >>> >>> It would be good to add information about what machines are affected >>> and what the user-visible problems are to the changelogs for future >>> reference. >>> >>> And do we want these two patches in -stable? If so, what -stable series should >>> they go into? >> >> Patch 2 v3.10+ >> >> Patch 3 v3.12+ > > You said [2-3/5] were cleanups, so why do you think they are -stable material? I misspoke these are not stable material > >> Patch 4/5 v3.13+ > > OK > > What about the bug information? Can you please point me to the e-mail threads > where the bugs were discussed at least? > > Rafael > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/