Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:17:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:17:17 -0500 Received: from ncc1701.cistron.net ([62.216.30.38]:37902 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:17:16 -0500 From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" Subject: Re: ps performance sucks Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 23:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Message-ID: References: <1036536496.777.57.camel@phantasy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1036538594 20721 62.216.29.67 (5 Nov 2002 23:23:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 896 Lines: 21 In article <1036536496.777.57.camel@phantasy>, Robert Love wrote: >On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 17:46, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> >> > (tough luck if you're using some other ps) >> >> Why do your procps mails always contain more references to >> procps 2 than to your own version ? >> >> What is your obsession with procps 2 ? > >Because he forked procps and cannot get over it. For the record, I'm using Alberts procps (using Debian), I have no idea what the code looks like, but it has a very high useability factor. No idea why everybody keeps flaming Albert for doing a good job. Mike. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/