Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265130AbSKEXqi>; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:46:38 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265152AbSKEXqi>; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:46:38 -0500
Received: from 1-064.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.181.137.64]:11675 "EHLO
	1-064.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S265130AbSKEXqi>; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:46:38 -0500
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:53:01 -0200 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: Mike Diehl <mdiehl@dominion.dyndns.org>
cc: Kevin Corry <corryk@us.ibm.com>, <evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Evms-announce] EVMS announcement
In-Reply-To: <20021105215100.E927E51CF@dominion.dyndns.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0211052152180.3411-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 801
Lines: 23

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Mike Diehl wrote:

> Well, I'm a bit disapointed.  My experience with LVM has been nothing
> short of disasterous; EVMS looked like a very good alternative to LVM.

> The biggest thing that EVMS had going for it was it's modular design.

So what's your point ?  Device mapper will be an EVMS module, from
the user's point of view.

regards,

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/