Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754014AbaBTXaf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:30:35 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:44903 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752414AbaBTXad (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:30:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:32:01 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/40] 3.13.4-stable review Message-ID: <20140220233201.GA6349@kroah.com> References: <20140218224433.337299968@linuxfoundation.org> <20140219043026.GA15371@roeck-us.net> <20140220183220.GD15290@kroah.com> <20140220232332.GA3584@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140220232332.GA3584@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:23:32PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:32:20AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:30:26PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:47:01PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.13.4 release. > > > > There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Feb 20 22:44:22 UTC 2014. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > Build results: > > > total: 126 pass: 122 skipped: 4 fail: 0 > > > > > > qemu tests all passed. > > > > > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. > > > > > > Results are as expected. > > > > Thanks for testing and letting me know. Interesting that the pstate > > buggy patch didn't hit your build system testing... > > > Nothing is perfect :-(. You mean the one where your builder > takes much more time to build the kernel with the patch applied, > or was here another one ? That same patch caused a bunch of boot-time failures on some systems. But not all of them, I think it depended on the hardware present. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/