Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756309AbaBTX5p (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:57:45 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46352 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756146AbaBTXyW (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:54:22 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov Subject: [PATCH 3.13 99/99] EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:53:34 -0800 Message-Id: <20140220235121.072459537@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0 In-Reply-To: <20140220235118.191692546@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20140220235118.191692546@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.61-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Borislav Petkov commit cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 upstream. We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period (edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec. On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been initialized already. Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391457913-881-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c @@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struc * * called with the mem_ctls_mutex held */ -static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec) +static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec, + bool init) { edac_dbg(0, "\n"); @@ -567,7 +568,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct m if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL) return; - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function); + if (init) + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function); + mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec)); } @@ -611,7 +614,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) { mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link); - edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value); + edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false); } mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex); @@ -782,7 +785,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info * /* This instance is NOW RUNNING */ mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL; - edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec()); + edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true); } else { mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/