Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754540AbaBUXcJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:32:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29699 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752769AbaBUXcH (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:32:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:32:02 -0500 From: Richard Guy Briggs To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: add arch field to seccomp event log Message-ID: <20140221233202.GH17952@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <4bc8c03bda84e004c331546e228b334811b03254.1392409147.git.rgb@redhat.com> <1392412322.2760.21.camel@localhost> <20140218205044.GL16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <1455468.M1LNEKA0EJ@x2> <20140219031519.GM16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20140219193751.GP16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140219193751.GP16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/02/19, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 14/02/18, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On 14/02/18, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:50:44 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > > > missing '=' but this isn't what audit_get_context() does... it's > > > > > crappy naming... I'd think a combo of audit_dummy_context() and > > > > > current->audit_context would be most appropriate. > > > > > > > > Ok. I think I finally understand audit_dummy_context(). Thanks for the > > > > hint. However, it appears it is not useful in this sitation, since if > > > > there is an audit_context, even a dummy context, it appears arch is > > > > filled in. > > > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c > > > > @@ -2406,12 +2406,18 @@ void audit_core_dumps(long signr) > > > > void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code) > > > > { > > > > struct audit_buffer *ab; > > > > + struct audit_context *context = current->audit_context; > > > > > > > > ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_SECCOMP); > > > > if (unlikely(!ab)) > > > > return; > > > > audit_log_task(ab); > > > > audit_log_format(ab, " sig=%ld", signr); > > > > + audit_log_format(ab, " arch="); > > > > + if (context) > > > > + audit_log_format(ab, "%x", context->arch); > > > > + else > > > > + audit_log_format(ab, "(null)"); > > > > audit_log_format(ab, " syscall=%ld", syscall); > > > > audit_log_format(ab, " compat=%d", is_compat_task()); > > > > audit_log_format(ab, " ip=0x%lx", KSTK_EIP(current)); > > > > > > Is there anything that could be passed by the caller that might identify the > > > syscall ABI when this call was blocked? '(null)' still makes syscall number > > > uninterpretable. > > > > This is the way it is done in the existing record that prints a syscall > > record in audit_log_exit(). > > > > It is set by the arch-dependent assembler linkage for > > __audit_syscall_entry() or set by the arch-dependent ptrace code that > > calls audit_syscall_entry(). In some arches there are a couple of > > choices. > > > > > > To pass this in to __audit_seccomp() as an arg, I'd have to add that arg > > to: > > __audit_seccomp() > > audit_seccomp() > > __secure_computing() > > secure_computing() > > > > > > As you've pointed out in IRC, there is a syscall_get_arch(current, regs) > > that could be used to get the arch when an audit context is not yet created. > > s390x architecture doesn't have it defined. :( It is defined, but is having trouble finding it... > > I was just looking for something like that... I am noticing that all > > arches call a variant of syscall_trace_enter() which first calls > > secure_computing() [which eventually calls __audit_seccomp()] *before* > > calling audit_syscall_entry() [which eventually sets context->arch]. So > > I'm not sure how task->audit_context->arch got set... Perhaps > > __audit_syscall_entry() should just call syscall_get_arch() instead of > > lugging it through the stack like it presently does. > > > > Is this going to give the same information? (I guess I should be able > > to answer that question...) > > > > > -Steve > > > > - RGB > > - RGB - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/