Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:28:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:28:10 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:13061 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 12:27:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Cc: manfred@colorfullife.com (Manfred Spraul), sct@redhat.com (Stephen C. Tweedie), hch@caldera.de (Christoph Hellwig), lord@sgi.com (Steve Lord), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) In-Reply-To: from "Linus Torvalds" at Feb 05, 2001 08:56:34 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > In fact, regular IDE DMA allows arbitrary scatter-gather at least in > theory. Linux has never used it, so I don't know how well it works in Purely in theory, as Jeff found out. > But despite a lot of likely practical reasons why it won't work for > arbitrary sg lists on plain IDE DMA, there is no _theoretical_ reason it > wouldn't. And there are bound to be better controllers that could handle > it. I2O controllers are required too handle it (most dont) and some of the high end scsi/fc controllers even get it right - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/