Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752553AbaBXNBk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:01:40 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:34518 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752516AbaBXNBj (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:01:39 -0500 Message-ID: <530B429C.2090507@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:01:16 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beulich , Daniel Borkmann CC: davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, ffusco@redhat.com, tgraf@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/hash: swap parameters of crc32_u32() References: <53073986020000780011E2E1@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5308938A.8070506@redhat.com> <530B0AF2020000780011E97B@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <530B1D60.8010602@redhat.com> <530B32A4020000780011EACB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <530B3102.4050102@redhat.com> <530B3BDB.3010908@zytor.com> <530B4C0C020000780011EC0D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <530B4058.80705@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <530B4058.80705@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/24/2014 04:51 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/24/2014 04:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> >>> So I'm guessing this hash is deliberately using the CRC32 instruction >>> "backwards", which would actually make sense: an actual CRC is actually >>> a pretty poor hash due to linearity. >>> > > OK, it really is even more confusing than that. > > It does seem like the crc32 instruction really *is* commutative, which > isn't something I would personally have expected at all. > > Given that fact, I suspect the ordering in the DPDK is actually a bug, > and that we should correct the ordering (which I would do at the call > sites because it seems to make the code clearer) because it reduces the > size of the loop by two instructions. > > I guess I should find out how to file a bug report against DPDK too... > Looking through the DPDK project git history, it seems that this was a bug introduced when changing from using inline assembly to using intrinsics: static inline uint32_t rte_hash_crc_4byte(uint32_t data, uint32_t init_val) { - asm volatile("crc32 %[data], %[init_val]" - : [init_val]"=r" (init_val) - : [data]"r" (data), "[init_val]" (init_val)); - return init_val; + return _mm_crc32_u32(data, init_val); } The operand order, of course, of the intrinsic being the opposite of AT&T-style assembly. I never expected that the CRC32 operation would be commutative. Very fascinating. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/