Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753307AbaBXR6P (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:58:15 -0500 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([78.47.125.74]:60608 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753157AbaBXR6O (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:58:14 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:58:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Rusty Russell , David Howells , Greg Kroah-Hartman Message-ID: <405776058.29534.1393264698347.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <20140224123926.0a44f32e@gandalf.local.home> References: <1392074600-21977-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20140213102817.4bfd5eac@gandalf.local.home> <2127052721.24380.1392306090965.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140213154507.4040fb06@gandalf.local.home> <1828346046.24803.1392349744601.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140224105454.3e1981ba@gandalf.local.home> <193756443.29489.1393260936319.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140224123926.0a44f32e@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [129.192.185.163] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.5_GA_5839 (ZimbraWebClient - FF27 (Linux)/8.0.5_GA_5839) Thread-Topic: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Thread-Index: WCpQGVHtiuub8Pp+jxXGMLhMzxm3hg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Rostedt" > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" , "Thomas > Gleixner" , "Rusty Russell" , "David Howells" , > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 12:39:26 PM > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC) > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Steven Rostedt" > > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > > > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo > > > Molnar" , "Thomas > > > Gleixner" , "Rusty Russell" , > > > "David Howells" , > > > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" > > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM > > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new > > > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > > > > > [...] > > > > (keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site) > > > > > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable. > > > > Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable > > ? > > The one that I replied to. I can't pull the module patch unless I get > an ack from Rusty. Do you mean the internal API semantic change you propose for tracepoints ? If yes, then how do you consider this a fix worthy of being backported to stable ? Thanks, Mathieu > > > > > This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in > > a separate thread marked [PATCH]. > > Yeah, I'll post it out soon enough. > > -- Steve > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/