Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753309AbaBXXPo (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:15:44 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:32902 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260AbaBXXPn (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:15:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:15:42 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Bjorn Helgaas cc: Jingoo Han , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Mohit Kumar , pci Subject: Re: [patch 07/26] pci: pcie-designware: Remove irq_desc abuse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <21860356.103351393198399120.JavaMail.weblogic@epml01> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > >> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> >> > >> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially > >> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well. > >> >> > >> >> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > >> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > >> >> Cc: Jingoo Han > >> >> Cc: Mohit Kumar > >> >> Cc: pci > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han > >> > >> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas > >> > >> Thomas, I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of your series. > >> I don't have any pending changes in this area. > > > > I can do, but it does not depend on anything else, so you can pick it > > up as well. Either way is fine. > > I never know what to do with these. I suggested that you pick it up > so the whole series would be together, because I assumed it would make > more sense in the git history to have all these similar changes > grouped together. But maybe that really doesn't matter. > > What's the recommended practice? Dunno. There is no rule. I'll merge it up with the rest of the lot. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/