Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753369AbaBYOm5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:42:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]:58437 "EHLO mail-ob0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753316AbaBYOmw (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:42:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3894986.dK3STNSG71@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <15ccc0609cb9ee3db0ad3a95b29bf69d11ea197c.1392375504.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <530C2FD7.4000105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <3894986.dK3STNSG71@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:12:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy() From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Lists linaro-kernel , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pierre Ossman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25 February 2014 18:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, why exactly does the core need to operate "current frequency" at all? I don't think I understood what you meant here. Do you mean why should we maintain policy->cur? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/