Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753017AbaBYP5R (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:57:17 -0500 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:40431 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752619AbaBYP5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:57:15 -0500 Message-ID: <530CBD53.9010605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:27:07 +0530 From: Hemant Kumar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Masami Hiramatsu CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com, hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, anton@redhat.com, systemtap@sourceware.org, namhyung@kernel.org, aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com, penberg@iki.fi Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] perf: Support for SDT markers References: <20140224090833.7998.5416.stgit@hemant-fedora> <530C821D.7000704@hitachi.com> In-Reply-To: <530C821D.7000704@hitachi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14022515-2000-0000-0000-00000FE4A7DE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/25/2014 05:14 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/02/24 18:14), Hemant Kumar wrote: >> This patchset helps in listing dtrace style markers(SDT) present in user space >> applications through perf. >> Notes/markers are placed at important places by the >> developers. They have a negligible overhead when not enabled. >> We can enable them and probe at these places and find some important information >> like the arguments' values, etc. >> >> We have lots of applications which use SDT markers today, like: >> Postgresql, MySql, Mozilla, Perl, Python, Java, Ruby, libvirt, QEMU, glib >> >> To add SDT markers into user applications: >> We need to have this header sys/sdt.h present. >> sys/sdt.h used is version 3. >> If not present, install systemtap-sdt-devel package (for fedora-18). >> >> Please refer to the Documentation patch to see how the SDT markers are added into >> a program. >> >> With this patchset, >> - Use perf to list the markers in the app: >> # perf list sdt ./user_app >> >> ./user_app : >> %user_app:foo_start >> %user_app:fun_start >> >> - Also, we can see the SDT markers present in our system in the usual binaries. >> These usual binaries are libraries (dsos) listed by ldconfig --print-cache and some >> binaries present in PATH environment variable. >> >> First, scan the binaries using : >> # perf list sdt --scan >> >> Creating a cache of SDT markers... >> perf sdt cache created! >> Use : "perf list sdt" >> to see the SDT markers > Hmm, in that case, I think you'd better introduce perf-sdt for scanning. > e.g. > > # perf sdt --scan app Hmm, this seems a better idea :) > then you can add app to sdt cache, without app, > > # perf sdt --scan > > will just scans all binaries on the PATH and the libraries which listed > by `ldconfig --print-caceh` > > And perf-list shows only the SDTs in the cache. Well, what will be better? perf-list or perf-sdt or perf-list sdt?? If perf-list, then wouldn't it be a huge list!! > > If there is no SDTs in the cache, `perf-list sdt` will warn you to > run the `perf sdt --scan`. Right. > >> After the sdt cache file is created, use perf list to view the markers : >> # perf list sdt >> >> %rtld : init_start >> %rtld : init_complete >> %rtld : map_failed >> %rtld : map_start >> %rtld : lll_futex_wake >> ... >> ... >> %libgcc : unwind >> %libvirt : rpc_server_client_auth_allow >> %libvirt : rpc_server_client_auth_fail >> %libvirt : rpc_server_client_auth_deny >> >> Alternatively, one can view the /var/cache/perf/perf-sdt.cache directly. >> >> This link shows an example of marker probing with Systemtap: >> https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/AddingUserSpaceProbingToApps >> >> Also, this link provides important info regarding SDT notes: >> http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation >> >> - Markers in binaries : >> These SDT markers are present in the ELF in the section named >> ".note.stapsdt". >> Here, the name of the marker, its provider, type, location, base >> address, semaphore address. >> We can retrieve these values using the members name_off and desc_off in >> Nhdr structure. If these are not enabled, they are present in the ELF as nop. >> >> Changes since last series : >> - Made the SDT markers present in a system more visible through perf list >> as suggested by Pekka Enberg. >> - Less complex command line interface to access the SDT markers. >> - Added a cache file to store most of the SDT markers of a system. >> >> TODO: >> - Add support to probe these SDT markers and integrate with a previous patch >> (support to perf to probe SDT markers) posted in lkml. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/23/10 > Yeah, but I think we'd better choose another way to integrate it. > Since SDT is like markers(static events), setting each of them via perf-probe is > not intuitive. :) I'd like to use it as an event, e.g. > > # perf top -e "%libgcc:unwind" > > And perf top internally calls perf-probe to add new uprobe event, and > clean the new event at exit. > > > Yeah! Right :) Makes sense. Will implement the suggestions in the next version asap! -- Thanks Hemant Kumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/