Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753432AbaBYQKY (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:10:24 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58364 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753269AbaBYQKW (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:10:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:11:56 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sitsofe Wheeler Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim McDonough , Jeff Layton , David Disseldorp , Steve French , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Stable backport of cifs nlink workaround? Message-ID: <20140225161156.GA27235@kroah.com> References: <20140225152443.GA15552@sucs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140225152443.GA15552@sucs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:24:43PM +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any chance that 74d290da476f672ad756634d12aa707375d3564d > ([CIFS] Provide sane values for nlink) could be backported to the stable > 3.2 kernel? Why just 3.2? What's wrong with all of the other kernels before 3.12 that do not have this patch in it? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/