Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753413AbaBYQ0Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65070 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753092AbaBYQ0Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:11 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Chris Bainbridge , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable Message-ID: <20140225162611.GA31902@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "H. Peter Anvin" , Chris Bainbridge , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20140225060146.GA4339@debian.local> <530C7465.2080600@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <530C7465.2080600@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:45:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/24/2014 10:01 PM, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > Pentium M is PAE capable but does not indicate so in the CPUID response. > > This is an issue now that some distributions are no longer shipping > > non-PAE kernels (those distributions no longer boot on Pentium M). This > > small patch fixes the issue by forcing the PAE capability on Pentium M. > > > > For more discussion see https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447 > > > > 1. This patch doesn't match the discussion in the link. > 2. You would have to also enable this in the cpu testing code in > arch/x86/boot. > 3. At the very least we need to print a serious warning that the CPU > is being run outside its specifications. I have no personal > information about why this CPUID bit was disabled, but it could be > that it was discovered in testing that it didn't work correctly in > all circumstances (e.g. high temperature.) This is very much "use > at your own risk..."; you could get data corruption or even > hardware damage. About six years ago, we almost went down this same path for Fedora, and I'm fairly sure the only reason we backed off and decided to not pursue it was that we found some Pentium M's where it just didn't work. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/