Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753461AbaBYWOb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:14:31 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:54616 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752978AbaBYWO3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:14:29 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Lists linaro-kernel , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pierre Ossman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy() Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 23:29:28 +0100 Message-ID: <1456811.7asrQYHEt1@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.13.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <15ccc0609cb9ee3db0ad3a95b29bf69d11ea197c.1392375504.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <3894986.dK3STNSG71@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 08:12:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25 February 2014 18:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, why exactly does the core need to operate "current frequency" at all? > > I don't think I understood what you meant here. Do you mean why should > we maintain policy->cur? Yes, what exactly do we need it for in the core? -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/