Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753224AbaBYXrC (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:47:02 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:42139 "EHLO mail-pb0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751344AbaBYXrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:47:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1393372009.2886.5.camel@linux-whg8.site> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for-next 4/4] epoll: epoll() syscall definition From: Nathaniel Yazdani To: Eric Wong Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:46:49 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20140225102144.GA10176@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <1393206162-18151-1-git-send-email-n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> <1393206162-18151-5-git-send-email-n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> <20140225102144.GA10176@dcvr.yhbt.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:21 +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Nathaniel Yazdani wrote: > > + * stores triggered eventpoll entries in the 'out' array. The input array is > > + * _not_ read-only, because the resulting event mask gets written back to each > > + * entry's ->ep_events field. When successful, this will be the same as before > > + * (plus EPOLLERR & EPOLLHUP). If ->ep_events gets cleared, then it is reasonable > > + * to infer that the entry's ->ep_fildes was a bad file descriptor. > > + */ > > > + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, in, inc * sizeof(struct epoll))) > > + goto out; > > + for (i = 0; i < inc; ++i) { > > + int fd, io; > > + long long id; > > + > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > + if (__get_user(fd, &in[i].ep_fildes) || > > + __get_user(io, &in[i].ep_events) || > > + __get_user(id, &in[i].ep_ident)) > > + goto out; > > + > > + ep_control(file->private_data, fd, &io, id, 0); > > + ret = -EFAULT; > > + if (__put_user(io, &in[i].ep_events)) > > + goto out; > > I don't think we should waste cycles writing to 'in' on success. Fair enough, my thought process was mainly too add some consistency to the system call, but removing that constraint would clean up ep_control() anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/