Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:59:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:59:29 -0500 Received: from harddata.com ([216.123.194.198]:37508 "EHLO mail.harddata.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:59:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:05:26 -0700 From: Michal Jaegermann To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Alan Cox , Werner Almesberger , Suparna Bhattacharya , Jeff Garzik , "Matt D. Robinson" , Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, lkcd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: What's left over. Message-ID: <20021106150526.A28533@mail.harddata.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ebiederm@xmission.com on Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:48:36AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 19 On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:48:36AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Then I guess the reasonable thing to do is to modify sys_reboot to > call machine_kexec instead of machine_restart when a kexec_image is > present. Or should I add another magic number, and another case to > sys_reboot? Given that "bird-eye" description why not to make a "normal" restart a particular case of kexec where you just have one kernel loaded from an external storage? It does not seem to be that much different although some issues are skipped or taken for granted. Or I am talking nonsense? Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/