Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:26:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:26:52 -0500 Received: from roc-24-93-20-125.rochester.rr.com ([24.93.20.125]:20733 "EHLO www.kroptech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:26:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:33:25 -0500 From: Adam Kropelin To: Patrick Mansfield Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.46: ide-cd cdrecord (almost) success report Message-ID: <20021106233325.GA29940@www.kroptech.com> References: <20021106041330.GA9489@www.kroptech.com> <20021106072223.GB4369@suse.de> <20021106155656.GA20403@www.kroptech.com> <20021106101144.A10985@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021106101144.A10985@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1747 Lines: 39 On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:11:44AM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:56:56AM -0500, Adam Kropelin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 08:22:23AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 05 2002, Adam Kropelin wrote: > > > > Still without coaster I tried one more thing... > > > > 'dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M' in parallel with another burn. That one > > > > did it in. ;) I'm running ext3 and the writeout load totally killed > > > > burn, which isn't surprising. I was asking for it, I know. What happened > > > > > > Really, this should work. The deadline scheduler should handle this just > > > fine in fact. Which device is your burner and which device is the hard > > > drive? It sounds like a bug. > > > > Hard disk is sdc on onboard AIC7xxx. > > Writer is hdc, the only device on the secondary onboard IDE channel. > > All other disks (IDE & SCSI) were idle during the test. > > What queue depth is the AIC setting? > > SCSI in 2.5.x no longer copies the request, so if you have a queue > depth larger than the allocated requests there might not be > any free requests left for the blk layer to play with. > > AIC default queue depth is 253 (with 2.5.46 queue depth can be set to 1 Are you talking tcq depth here? Best as I can tell, 2.5.46 defaults to 16. Lowering it to 2 doesn't seem to help. > queue depth). You can modify .config, or pass boot/module options to > lower it. If I've misunderstood you, please clue me in and I'll give it a shot... --Adam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/