Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753972AbaBZWAN (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:00:13 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:47730 "EHLO mail-wg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751159AbaBZWAL (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:00:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:00:04 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Arnd Bergmann , davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, Samuel Ortiz , Kevin Hilman , Sekhar Nori , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cyril Chemparathy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mfd: remove obsolete ti-ssp driver Message-ID: <20140226220004.GQ9195@lee--X1> References: <1393418614-3968549-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1393418614-3968549-5-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20140226125157.GM9195@lee--X1> <20140226205703.GA21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140226205703.GA21483@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > The tnetv107x platform is getting removed, so this driver > > > is not needed any more. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz > > > Cc: Lee Jones > > > --- > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 11 -- > > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 - > > > drivers/mfd/ti-ssp.c | 465 --------------------------------------------------- > > > 3 files changed, 477 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/ti-ssp.c > > > > Applied, thanks. > > This makes me wonder whether you apply any patch you receive via email, > or whether you read the covering email first. I did (miss-)read the cover letter first. > Arnd's 0/5 email said: > > However, I'm looking for an Ack from > Cyril Chemparathy and Sekhar Nori first, to be sure we > won't need this code in the future. I read this to mean "looking for an Ack from Cyril and Sekhar for patches which are due to go in via a different tree (ARM-SoC?)". My apologies for misreading. Patch removed from MFD -next until I get a further nod. > This is exactly the reason why I'd now recommend that if people want to > send out patches which they don't intend maintainers to take, that they > use "[PATCH RFC" in the subject _and_ they make sure that the patch can't > be trivially applied. That means maintainers have to (a) not notice the > RFC in the subject, and _then_ they have to intentionally fix the patch > before applying. Both taken together will be sufficient deterrent for > this kind of mistake happening. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/