Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754714AbaB0Dj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:39:29 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:13616 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752466AbaB0Dj2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 22:39:28 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,551,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="463147473" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:39:20 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Stefani Seibold , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , John Stultz , Pavel Emelyanov , Cyrill Gorcunov , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@rohde-schwarz.com, Andreas.Brief@rohde-schwarz.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Mark __vdso entries as asmlinkage Message-ID: <20140227033920.GI12219@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:02:13PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > This makes no difference for 64-bit, bit it's critical for 32-bit code: > these functions are called from outside the kernel, so they need to comply > with the ABI. That's an odd patch. If that was wrong things couldn't have worked at all. Probably hidden by inlining? If yes just make it static Also you would rather need notrace more often. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/