Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:10:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:10:36 -0500 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:17162 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:10:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:17:10 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Alexander Viro , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: What's left over. Message-ID: <20021107091710.G10679@almesberger.net> References: <20021105221050.A10679@almesberger.net> <20021105230505.D10679@almesberger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from ebiederm@xmission.com on Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:04:48PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 997 Lines: 23 Eric W. Biederman wrote: [ Al's FS-based kexec interface ] > For the record my opinion is there is extra code bloat but it is ok > if it is built as kexecfs. Any other way of getting a magic file > to work with seems currently insane. Yes, such an interface change would only make sense if you couldn't get the system call, or if there would actually be a useful way for setting up kexec using "third party" programs. But it seems unlikely to me that somebody could get all the magic right just by using dd. - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/