Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:33:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:33:59 -0500 Received: from surf.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.182]:3993 "EHLO surf.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:33:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 06:37:53 -0600 To: Roman Zippel Cc: kbuild-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [kbuild] Possibility to sanely link against off-directory .so Message-ID: <20021107123753.GN4182@cadcamlab.org> References: <20021106185230.GD5219@pasky.ji.cz> <20021106212952.GB1035@mars.ravnborg.org> <20021106220347.GE5219@pasky.ji.cz> <20021107100021.GL4182@cadcamlab.org> <20021107114747.GM4182@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 20 [Peter Samuelson] > > Huh? I don't get it. How is a shared library any better than a static > > library in this regard? I'm pondering the traditional advantages of > > shared libraries, and I cannot think of a single one that matters here. [Roman Zippel] > Shared libraries can be loaded dynamically, this means distribution can > package the graphical front ends and the user doesn't need to install > huge development packages. I still don't get it. Why can't the distribution vendor just link /usr/bin/qconf against $(LINUX)/scripts/kconfig/libkconfig.a? Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/