Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:48:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:48:55 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:48880 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:48:55 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 13/07/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20021107145112.GA24278@suse.de> References: <20021107145112.GA24278@suse.de> <1036415133.1106.10.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021104025458.GA3088@zip.com.au> <9668.1036679581@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Dave Jones Cc: Alan Cox , CaT , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.5.45 / boottime oops (pnp bios I think) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:55:30 +0000 Message-ID: <11262.1036680930@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 748 Lines: 22 davej@codemonkey.org.uk said: > Relatively pointless given that there are more and more boxes out > there that won't boot without ACPI these days. There are also more and more boxes out there which won't run X without the nvidia driver loaded. Does that mean we shouldn't bother to record that information either? I'm not necessarily suggesting we should automatically ignore all reports with the 'BIOS' taint flag set as we do the 'Proprietary' flag; just that it should be reported. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/