Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:44:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:44:27 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:45042 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:44:26 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 13/07/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20021107154609.GB25903@suse.de> References: <20021107154609.GB25903@suse.de> <20021107145112.GA24278@suse.de> <1036415133.1106.10.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021104025458.GA3088@zip.com.au> <9668.1036679581@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <11262.1036680930@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Dave Jones Cc: Alan Cox , CaT , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.5.45 / boottime oops (pnp bios I think) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 15:50:59 +0000 Message-ID: <16807.1036684259@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 662 Lines: 22 davej@codemonkey.org.uk said: > Crap. The OSS driver works fine, just not as accelerated. Ah. It must have got a lot better since I last tried it then -- last time I looked it wouldn't work on the newer chips at all. I had to use the vesa driver instead. > I don't see what it would buy us. It makes it clear that untrusted and undebuggable code is running, just like the 'Proprietary' flag does. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/