Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:14:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:14:41 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:17676 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:14:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:20:05 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: John Levon cc: Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: NMI watchdog question. In-Reply-To: <20021106200726.GA2388@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1207 Lines: 31 On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:49:07AM -0800, george anzinger wrote: > > > So the performance counters are only used on UP machines? > > no. nmi_watchdog=1 -> I/O APIC is used iff available and it works > nmi_watchdog=2 -> local APIC LVTPC set to interrupt in NMI mode when > perfctr overflows. > > =2 can be used on both UP and SMP, =1 is only available on UP for the > rare machines that have an I/O APIC on a UP motherboard (I believe there > are some, but I don't know if the code is set up to do so properly). By any chance, does this implementation imply that if I boot SMP with 'noapic' the NMI watchdog won't work? It doesn't, but I am not sure I had it on before I turned off the APIC. Clearly this would be desirable to work, as noapic is needed on a fairly large minority of machines. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/