Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:31:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:31:33 -0500 Received: from pullyou.nist.gov ([129.6.16.93]:15239 "EHLO postmark.nist.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:31:32 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Majordomo results References: From: Ian Soboroff Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:37:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Rik van Riel's message of "Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:54:10 -0200 (BRST)") Message-ID: <9cf8z05qigu.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 14 Rik van Riel writes: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >> Could these DoS attempts get filtered somehow? > > Come on, if Ryan Cumming wants to make an ass out of himself, > why shouldn't he be allowed to ? ;) It might be an innocent fat-finger problem... I use a digestifying mailing list gateway to get lkml and almost comitted this error myself... ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/