Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751974AbaDAN05 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 09:26:57 -0400 Received: from am1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.204]:16847 "EHLO am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751821AbaDAN0z (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 09:26:55 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: VS-2(z579ehz98dI1432Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h2189h1d1ah1d2ah21bch1fc6hzzz2dh2a8h839h944hd25hd2bhf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1b2fh2222h224fh1fb3h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1fe8h1ff5h209eh2216h22d0h2336h2438h2461h2487h24d7h2516h2545h255eh25cch25f6h2605h262fh268bh1155h) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:21:57 +0800 From: Nicolin Chen To: Mark Brown CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams Message-ID: <20140401132156.GB27586@MrMyself> References: <1396322227-482-1-git-send-email-Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> <1396322227-482-3-git-send-email-Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> <20140401120715.GR2269@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140401120715.GR2269@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%FREESCALE.MAIL.ONMICROSOFT.COM$RO%1$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:07:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun > > on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did, > > enabling TERE but remaining FRDE disabled, even though the xrun on the > > opposite direction will not break the current stream. > > This still doesn't apply against fsl-sai (nor for-next). Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and "ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could not be applied against it as it needs the macro that's included in the patch "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag". What should I do now? Thank you, Nicolin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/