Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:03:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:03:40 -0500 Received: from ip68-105-128-224.tc.ph.cox.net ([68.105.128.224]:11965 "EHLO Bill-The-Cat.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:03:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:10:17 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Templates and tweaks (for size performance and more) Message-ID: <20021107221017.GB12151@opus.bloom.county> References: <20021107190910.GC6164@opus.bloom.county> <20021107210304.C11437@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20021107210808.D11437@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021107210808.D11437@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 927 Lines: 22 On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:08:08PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > Oh, there's another problem built into this method as well. > > Instead of one "tweak" depending on one configuration option, it suddenly > depends on a whole load of configuration options. You change one of these > options, and you rebuild everything that uses the asm/tweaks.h (or whatever > the filename was.) > > IMHO this is a backward step. ;( That is annoying. But I'm not quite sure how this doesn't happen for . Is it just the -> which is what is actually changed? Or is there more magic to it? -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/