Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:59:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:59:23 -0500 Received: from ophelia.ess.nec.de ([193.141.139.8]:44432 "EHLO ophelia.ess.nec.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:59:22 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Erich Focht To: Michael Hohnbaum Subject: Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:05:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Robert Love , Anton Blanchard , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel References: <200211061734.42713.efocht@ess.nec.de> <1036606243.23147.4.camel@dyn9-47-17-164.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1036606243.23147.4.camel@dyn9-47-17-164.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200211080005.31181.efocht@ess.nec.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 19 On Wednesday 06 November 2002 19:10, Michael Hohnbaum wrote: > > Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the > > core and the initial load balancer separate? > > This is fine with me. Can't the core changes and and load > balancer be maintained as separate changesets within the bk > tree? OK, I'll do that. Any idea how I can apply a changeset which has another name attached to it than mine? Regards, Erich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/