Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:41:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:41:34 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:61708 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:41:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.46-mm1 with contest From: Robert Love To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux kernel mailing list , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <200211080953.22903.conman@kolivas.net> References: <200211080953.22903.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 07 Nov 2002 18:48:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1036712891.764.2055.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 950 Lines: 28 On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 17:53, Con Kolivas wrote: > io_load: > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > 2.5.44-mm6 [3] 284.1 28 20 10 3.98 > 2.5.46 [1] 600.5 13 48 12 8.41 > 2.5.46-mm1 [5] 134.3 58 6 8 1.88 > > Big change here. IO load is usually the one we feel the most. Nice. > Unfortunately I've only run this with preempt enabled so far and I believe > many of the improvements are showing this effect. Since your aim is desktop performance, I would like it if you always ran with kernel preemption enabled. That is what we are targeting for desktop performance. Good job, Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/