Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:57:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:57:29 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:38157 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:57:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.46-mm1 with contest From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: Con Kolivas , linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <3DCAFE38.16DED3BF@digeo.com> References: <200211080953.22903.conman@kolivas.net> <1036712891.764.2055.camel@phantasy> <3DCAFE38.16DED3BF@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 07 Nov 2002 19:04:08 -0500 Message-Id: <1036713848.764.2107.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1001 Lines: 30 On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 18:58, Andrew Morton wrote: > Robert Love wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 17:53, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > > io_load: > > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > > > 2.5.44-mm6 [3] 284.1 28 20 10 3.98 > > > 2.5.46 [1] 600.5 13 48 12 8.41 > > > 2.5.46-mm1 [5] 134.3 58 6 8 1.88 > > > > > > Big change here. IO load is usually the one we feel the most. > > > > Nice. > > Mysterious. Why? We are preempting during the generic file write/read routines, I bet, which can otherwise be long periods of latency. CPU is up and I bet the throughput is down, but his test is getting the attention it wants. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/