Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030644AbaDBWGo (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:06:44 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]:48884 "EHLO mail-oa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030526AbaDBWGl (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:06:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:06:38 -0500 From: Kim Phillips To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, stuart.yoder@freescale.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz, bhelgaas@google.com, Varun.Sethi@freescale.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, agraf@suse.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, d.kasatkin@samsung.com, tj@kernel.org, scottwood@freescale.com, a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com, tech@virtualopensystems.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, toshi.kani@hp.com, a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, kim.phillips@freescale.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: Introduce new device binding path using pci_dev.driver_override Message-Id: <20140402170638.51745f5c231a7632422e4cc5@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20140402002324.GA2662@kroah.com> References: <20140401161851.18815.31108.stgit@bling.home> <20140401185212.7229f2c114c7e95089f00e90@linaro.org> <20140402002324.GA2662@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:23:24 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 06:52:12PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 10:28:54 -0600 > > Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > > The driver_override field allows us to specify the driver for a device > > > rather than relying on the driver to provide a positive match of the > > > device. This shortcuts the existing process of looking up the vendor > > > and device ID, adding them to the driver new_id, binding the device, > > > then removing the ID, but it also provides a couple advantages. > > > > > > First, the above process allows the driver to bind to any device > > > matching the new_id for the window where it's enabled. This is often > > > not desired, such as the case of trying to bind a single device to a > > > meta driver like pci-stub or vfio-pci. Using driver_override we can > > > do this deterministically using: > > > > > > echo pci-stub > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver_override > > > echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver/unbind > > > echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe > > > > > > Previously we could not invoke drivers_probe after adding a device > > > to new_id for a driver as we get non-deterministic behavior whether > > > the driver we intend or the standard driver will claim the device. > > > Now it becomes a deterministic process, only the driver matching > > > driver_override will probe the device. > > > > > > To return the device to the standard driver, we simply clear the > > > driver_override and reprobe the device, ex: > > > > > > echo > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/preferred_driver > > > echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:00.0/driver/unbind > > > echo 0000:03:00.0 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers_probe > > > > > > Another advantage to this approach is that we can specify a driver > > > override to force a specific binding or prevent any binding. For > > > instance when an IOMMU group is exposed to userspace through VFIO > > > we require that all devices within that group are owned by VFIO. > > > However, devices can be hot-added into an IOMMU group, in which case > > > we want to prevent the device from binding to any driver (preferred > > > driver = "none") or perhaps have it automatically bind to vfio-pci. > > > With driver_override it's a simple matter for this field to be set > > > internally when the device is first discovered to prevent driver > > > matches. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson > > > --- > > > > > > Apologies for the exceptionally long cc list, this is a follow-up to > > > Stuart's "Subject: mechanism to allow a driver to bind to any device" > > > thread. This is effectively a v2 of the proof-of-concept patch I > > > posted in that thread. This version changes to use a dummy id struct > > > to return on an "override" match, which removes the collateral damage > > > and greatly simplifies the patch. This feels fairly well baked for > > > PCI and I would expect that platform drivers could do a similar > > > implementation. From there perhaps we can discuss whether there's > > > any advantage to placing driver_override on struct device. The logic > > > for incorporating it into the match still needs to happen per bus > > > driver, so it might only contribute to consistency of the show/store > > > sysfs attributes to move it up to struct device. Please comment. > > > > Sounds like Greg likes this approach more than {drv,dev}_sysfs_only. > > I have made no such judgement, I only pointed out that if you ok. If no-one chimes in in favour of one or the other, driver_override works for platform devices. > modify/add/remove a sysfs file, it needs to have documentation for it. ok, so the platform device implementation should add a new Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-platform... > > The diff below is the result of duplicating and converting this patch > > for platform devices, and, indeed, binding a device to the > > vfio-platform driver succeeds with: > > > > echo vfio-platform > /sys/bus/platform/devices/fff51000.ethernet/driver_override > > echo fff51000.ethernet > /sys/bus/platform/devices/fff51000.ethernet/driver/unbind > > echo fff51000.ethernet > /sys/bus/platform/drivers_probe > > > > However, it's almost pure duplication modulo the bus match code. The > > only other place I can see where to put the common bus check is > > drivers/base/base.h:driver_match_device(), which I'm guessing is > > off-limits? So should we leave this as per-bus code, and somehow > > refactor driver_override_{show,store}? > > If you can provide a way for this to be done in a bus-independant way, > like we did for new_id and the like, I'd be open to reviewing it. I may be blind, but I don't see any new_id-related code shared between drivers/pci/pci-driver.c and, e.g., drivers/usb/serial/bus.c, nor do I see anything new_id related in drivers/base/. So if we are to follow the current model, the PCI and platform device implementations should be maintained separately. Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/