Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:01:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:01:34 -0500 Received: from modemcable191.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.191]:36105 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:01:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:05:14 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" cc: Mikael Pettersson , Linux Kernel , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5-AC] Forced enable/disable local APIC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 811 Lines: 21 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Well, the "lapic" option should override the DMI setting, not the > APICBASE availability check. Anyway, I don't insist on this that much -- > while I think consistency is good, none of the "*apic" options are > actually a necessity for me. If one needs the option, one may still cook > an appropriate patch oneself. I think the nolapic is definitely needed because i've come across a number of bug reports where the simplest solution would be to just disable the local apic. Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/