Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:16:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:16:24 -0500 Received: from kim.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.178]:20433 "EHLO kim.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:16:23 -0500 From: Mikael Pettersson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15819.47795.543312.435264@kim.it.uu.se> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:22:59 +0100 To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Mikael Pettersson , Linux Kernel , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5-AC] Forced enable/disable local APIC In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1126 Lines: 26 Zwane Mwaikambo writes: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > Well, the "lapic" option should override the DMI setting, not the > > APICBASE availability check. Anyway, I don't insist on this that much -- > > while I think consistency is good, none of the "*apic" options are > > actually a necessity for me. If one needs the option, one may still cook > > an appropriate patch oneself. > > I think the nolapic is definitely needed because i've come across a number > of bug reports where the simplest solution would be to just disable the > local apic. People with broken boxes should send their DMI data to me so I can add their boxes to the local APIC blacklist in dmi_scan.c. "nolapic" is simply a workaround for the absence of this DMI data. Notice how silent the Inspiron 8k users are now that the DMI black list is implemented... /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/