Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:20:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:20:56 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:58760 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:20:55 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:37:35 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Jamie Lokier cc: Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch] epoll bits 0.30 ... In-Reply-To: <20021108160955.GA30234@bjl1.asuk.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 808 Lines: 23 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Rusty, the hash is not under pressure over there. The only time seeks is > > performed is at file removal ( from the set ) and eventually at file > > modify. There's a direct link between the wait queue and its item during > > the high frequency event delivery, so need seek is performed. > > It does seem peculiar to use a prime-sized hash table, though. These > days, good power-of-two-sized hash functions are well known. To make everyone happy the latest code uses hash.h :) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/