Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753078AbaDDPJz (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:09:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22762 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752526AbaDDPJx (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:09:53 -0400 Message-ID: <1396624170.2790.9.camel@adam.happyassassin.net> Authentication-Results: mail.happyassassin.net; dmarc=none header.from=redhat.com Subject: Re: [tip:x86/reboot] [PATCH] x86: Try the BIOS reboot method before the PCI reboot method From: Adam Williamson To: "Li, Aubrey" Cc: Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:09:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <533EB5F1.8060002@linux.intel.com> References: <20140404064120.GB11877@gmail.com> <20140404080006.GB6944@gmail.com> <533EB5F1.8060002@linux.intel.com> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 21:38 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > > > On 2014/4/4 16:00, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >> > >> [PATCH] x86: Try the BIOS reboot method before the PCI reboot method > > > > So, JFYI, I have put this into x86/reboot to get it tested, but it's > > not queued up for upstream yet until there's concensus. > > > > (Steve testing it wouldn't hurt either.) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ingo > > The change is originated from the following bug: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70931 > > The system will hang after BIOS or TRIPLE if it doesn't work, that's why > I added CF9 before BIOS and TRIPLE. > > Adam may want to try this change to see if reboot works on his DELL > Venue 8 Pro. > > I don't think there is enough justification to revert the patch. We > introduce EFI into the default list, we didn't see any reason to remove > it out so far. AIUI the bottom line for Baytrail-y devices is that they'll be OK so long as EFI is tried before anything which causes a hang, right? I can try patches out for sure and confirm, but it'd be good to have a definite candidate. Are we considering the first patch alone - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3937101/ - or also the second patch - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3937091/ ? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/