Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753568AbaDEAUA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 20:20:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:47291 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753020AbaDEAT6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2014 20:19:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:19:53 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Liviu Dudau Cc: linux-pci , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linaro-kernel , Arnd Bergmann , LKML , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , LAKML , Tanmay Inamdar , Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] pci: Introduce pci_register_io_range() helper function. Message-ID: <20140405001953.GE15806@google.com> References: <1394811272-1547-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1394811272-1547-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1394811272-1547-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > Some architectures do not share x86 simple view of the PCI I/O space > and instead use a range of addresses that map to bus addresses. For > some architectures these ranges will be expressed by OF bindings > in a device tree file. It's true that the current Linux "x86 view of PCI I/O space" is pretty simple and limited. But I don't think that's a fundamental x86 limitation (other than the fact that the actual INB/OUTB/etc. CPU instructions themselves are limited to a single 64K I/O port space). Host bridges on x86 could have MMIO apertures that turn CPU memory accesses into PCI port accesses. We could implement any number of I/O port spaces this way, by making the kernel inb()/outb()/etc. interfaces smart enough to use the memory-mapped space instead of (or in addition to) the INB/OUTB/etc. instructions. ia64 does this (see arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h for a little description) and I think maybe one or two other arches have something similar. > Introduce a pci_register_io_range() helper function that can be used > by the architecture code to keep track of the I/O ranges described by the > PCI bindings. If the PCI_IOBASE macro is not defined that signals > lack of support for PCI and we return an error. I don't quite see how you intend to use this, because this series doesn't include any non-stub implementation of pci_register_io_range(). Is this anything like the ia64 strategy I mentioned above? If so, it would be really nice to unify some of this stuff. > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau > Acked-by: Grant Likely > Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar > --- > drivers/of/address.c | 9 +++++++++ > include/linux/of_address.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c > index 1a54f1f..be958ed 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/address.c > +++ b/drivers/of/address.c > @@ -619,6 +619,15 @@ const __be32 *of_get_address(struct device_node *dev, int index, u64 *size, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_address); > > +int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size) > +{ > +#ifndef PCI_IOBASE > + return -EINVAL; > +#else > + return 0; > +#endif > +} > + > unsigned long __weak pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address) > { > if (address > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) > diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h > index 5f6ed6b..40c418d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/of_address.h > +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ extern void __iomem *of_iomap(struct device_node *device, int index); > extern const __be32 *of_get_address(struct device_node *dev, int index, > u64 *size, unsigned int *flags); > > +extern int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t size); > extern unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t addr); > > extern int of_pci_range_parser_init(struct of_pci_range_parser *parser, > -- > 1.9.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/