Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 15:16:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 15:16:31 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:43023 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 15:16:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:19:20 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: "Richard B. Johnson" , Douglas Gilbert , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: sscanf("-1", "%d", &i) fails, returns 0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 29 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Randy.Dunlap wrote: ? > Sure, it looks cleaner that way, although gcc has already put <*dig> > in a local register; i.e., it's not pulled from memory for each test. > Here's a (tested) version that does that. Why do you have that "dig" pointer at all? It's not really used. Why not just do + char digit; ... + digit = str; + if (digit == '-') + digit = str[1]; (and maybe it should also test for whether signed stuff is even alloed or not, ie maybe the test should be "if (is_sign && digit == '-')" instead) Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/