Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:24:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:24:05 -0500 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com ([216.239.45.4]:62214 "EHLO 216-239-45-4.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:24:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3DCC2D01.6050309@google.com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:30:41 -0800 From: Ross Biro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] Failed writes marked clean? References: <3DCC1EB5.4020303@google.com> <3DCC252F.65C0F70B@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 896 Lines: 23 Andrew Morton wrote: >Also, think about what a write error _means_. Unless the disk is truly >ancient, it means that the device has run out of alternate space for >the block, or all writes are failing. ie: it is a serious failure. > > I've seen all sorts of interesting drive failure modes, including losing communications with the drive for a short period and then having it come back almost as good as new. We've had some data corruption on flaky drives and I'm guessing this has something to do with it. I'm going to sit down with our application developers and see what they want to see from their end and see what I can do. Ross - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/