Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754616AbaDFWdy (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2014 18:33:54 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36220 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753191AbaDFWdw (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Apr 2014 18:33:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:33:38 +1000 From: NeilBrown To: Toralf =?UTF-8?B?RsO2cnN0ZXI=?= Cc: Roger Heflin , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: NFS V4 calls for a NFS v3 mount Message-ID: <20140407083338.351db1c7@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <53419674.7010509@gmx.de> References: <53418E98.8030505@gmx.de> <53419674.7010509@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id s36MXwPd001163 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 20:01:24 +0200 Toralf Förster wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 04/06/2014 07:57 PM, Roger Heflin wrote: > > No where in the mount command did you tell it that this was a > > nfsversion 3 only mount, the mount name itself means nothing to > > mount, so it tired nfs version 4 first then nfs version 3. > > > > Note this in the man page for nfs: nfsvers=n The NFS protocol > > version number used to contact the server's NFS service. If the > > server does not support the requested version, the mount > > request fails. If this option is not specified, the client > > negotiates a suitable version with the server, trying version 4 > > first, version 3 second, and version 2 last. > > > > ick, I misunderstand the key word "nfs4" in /etc/fstab - I thought > that (and only that) would activate any NFS v4 Calls : > > Hre all of my setting > $ grep nfs /etc/fstab > n22:/mnt/ramdisk /mnt/nfsv2 nfs auto,bg,intr,soft,nfsvers=2 > n22:/mnt/ramdisk /mnt/nfsv3 nfs auto,bg,intr,soft > n22: /mnt/nfsv4 nfs4 auto,bg,intr,soft That was used to indicate nfsv4 early in development, possibly to make sure it didn't get used by default, but it was quickly realised that having a separate filesystem type was confusing. So while "nfs4" does still work an selected vers=4, it is deprecated. You should always use "nfs" if possible. BTW the nfs list is "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" - suitable for "noobs", developers, and everyone in between. NeilBrown > > > Thx for explanation. > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Toralf Förster > > wrote: Probably a question better suited > > for a NFS noobs mailing list (is there any around ?) ... > > > > While playing with kernel 3.13.x, wireshark and NFS I realized, > > that mounting a NFS v3 share results in NFS V4 Calls - is this > > indented or a wireshark dissector issue ? > > > > > > $ cat /etc/exports # /etc/exports: NFS file systems being exported. > > See exports(5). /mnt/ramdisk > > 192.168.0.0/16(rw,fsid=0,insecure,no_subtree_check,async,no_root_squash) > > > > > > > > $ grep nfsv3 /etc/fstab n22:/mnt/ramdisk /mnt/nfsv3 nfs > > auto,bg,intr,soft > > > - -- > MfG/Sincerely > Toralf Förster > pgp finger print:1A37 6F99 4A9D 026F 13E2 4DCF C4EA CDDE 0076 E94E > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iF4EAREIAAYFAlNBlnQACgkQxOrN3gB26U41HQD8D/KROgItC324iDevD33vJ6QS > PcSWPcBTzimC0cMOfzkA/04ejAWOGGqyqNedV5Ps235rxqbxDWoiUS7M7iQtu/Wz > =jJAD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBU0HWQjnsnt1WYoG5AQLr+Q//az/LlGyQRBKGCcrNAEUxeI7msLur6aAR 6j/ecJkjNtI+D4o3WuUZQlkxnvjZ7uA9RacRbLc7UHDh7kWpJjsoCl/s6SkS1RY2 y3KHOY/vm6+jwBXRknbGPMjPDNDA34s0cok2/so6ELyL82Uxd/Zsrhua6/yxoj8D 6J2p2KLY6DqgmJnicTAmZf5F2gVCnL0cwuv16wKCsCrf24O0d9eXqjStYUV62jLX m3JrzB8JxovT7LmU9jsH1ChE7PW6sAd92R1lzrgQM7XNLoy4Q3bggWBNcLOATRNp V5uGXCOXW+mnnPCdwhQkK7hoJf4dpkodU+BDydZO/oet2kE84eQYM0oyl5Ebz+mR nOKQwp7Y2Zitj4ZzAfa9KrxteZ6Pa5ISv0Olbjw/3W0aL148Y3UmEo9cT4kUzhAm hiNzN7K2835vOVZvtCW3Woq+sN66v7Jp9Ig/6ZNAsAizH2oMl9F9k/fH6u8P9bV4 4Lc9nc9yo6IzFVlJYbM3wPMod70gQz9QNCNXvRH9m6ospV+wY/TFfvqYNCAE9msk tjbKnfYCNoAdGgPSW2tHbpqM42ZwYpy6wu7gG3Io98CtsoUiJbG7meMj6FkkWOno 6dW8CVovxdGrdQP1cLQbyVUKX4XYDRzI2eCJI7sUH11Sn8o+Ft0rRtxzeLpE4s4t 3vGS4lERy+U= =EiAW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?