Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756404AbaDHHlc (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 03:41:32 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo02.lge.com ([156.147.1.126]:42135 "EHLO lgeamrelo02.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756131AbaDHHlb (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 03:41:31 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Don Zickus , acme@ghostprotocols.net, LKML , jmario@redhat.com, fowles@inreach.com, peterz@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, andi.kleen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15 V3] perf, c2c: Rework setup code to prepare for features References: <1395689826-215033-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1395689826-215033-6-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <20140329171018.GA2022@krava.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:41:29 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20140329171018.GA2022@krava.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:10:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87ob0cw9na.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:10:18 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:36:56PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > > SNIP > >> >> static int perf_c2c__process_load_store(struct perf_c2c *c2c, >> + struct addr_location *al, >> struct perf_sample *sample, >> - struct addr_location *al) >> + struct perf_evsel *evsel) >> { >> - if (c2c->raw_records) >> - perf_sample__fprintf(sample, ' ', "raw input", al, stdout); >> + struct mem_info *mi; >> + >> + mi = sample__resolve_mem(sample, al); >> + if (!mi) >> + return -ENOMEM; > > perhaps not directly related to this patchset, but I needed > attached patch to get resolved data in .bss (static), which > for some reason happened to be located in executable segment Wasn't it a read-only/const data? Hmm.. maybe we could copy the text map and add it to a variable map group if it has any variables in it.. Thanks, Namhyung > > I wonder why we need this VARIABLE/FUNCTION separation at all, > I think Arnaldo told me some archs could have same addresses > for data and functions.. will check ;-) > > jirka > > --- > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > index d9d86c6..be6d7cf 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > @@ -1220,6 +1220,10 @@ static void ip__resolve_data(struct machine *machine, struct thread *thread, > > thread__find_addr_location(thread, machine, m, MAP__VARIABLE, addr, > &al); > + if (!al.map) > + thread__find_addr_location(thread, machine, m, MAP__FUNCTION, addr, > + &al); > + > ams->addr = addr; > ams->al_addr = al.addr; > ams->sym = al.sym; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/