Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:35:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:35:34 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:48542 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 07:35:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] notsc option needs some attention/TLC From: Alan Cox To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , zwane@holomorphy.com, Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <200211091200.NAA19909@harpo.it.uu.se> References: <200211091200.NAA19909@harpo.it.uu.se> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 09 Nov 2002 13:05:49 +0000 Message-Id: <1036847149.20313.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 15 On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 12:00, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > If we configure for "I have a TSC, period" you add the option > to disable it, which nullifies any benefit of the config option > in the first place since we can't assume TSC presence any more. > If we don't configure for TSC, you force tsc_disable, which means > that a generic kernel _can't_ use the TSC. 2.4 was modified to printk a message that TSC was not disabled. This does confuse people - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/