Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 10:11:07 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, jmario@redhat.com,
        fowles@inreach.com, peterz@infradead.org, eranian@google.com,
        andi.kleen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15 V3] perf, c2c: Rework setup code to prepare for
 features
Message-ID: <20140408141107.GT8488@redhat.com>
References: <1395689826-215033-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
 <1395689826-215033-6-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
 <20140329171018.GA2022@krava.redhat.com>
 <87ob0cw9na.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ob0cw9na.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:41:29PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:10:18 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:36:56PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> >>  
> >>  static int perf_c2c__process_load_store(struct perf_c2c *c2c,
> >> +					struct addr_location *al,
> >>  					struct perf_sample *sample,
> >> -					struct addr_location *al)
> >> +					struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> >>  {
> >> -	if (c2c->raw_records)
> >> -		perf_sample__fprintf(sample, ' ', "raw input", al, stdout);
> >> +	struct mem_info *mi;
> >> +
> >> +	mi = sample__resolve_mem(sample, al);
> >> +	if (!mi)
> >> +		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > perhaps not directly related to this patchset, but I needed
> > attached patch to get resolved data in .bss (static), which
> > for some reason happened to be located in executable segment
> 
> Wasn't it a read-only/const data?

I believe it had the 'x' bit set.  Or the kernel was not passing any
protection bits, so it defaulted to MAP_FUNCTION?

Cheers,
Don

> 
> Hmm.. maybe we could copy the text map and add it to a variable map
> group if it has any variables in it..
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
> 
> >
> > I wonder why we need this VARIABLE/FUNCTION separation at all,
> > I think Arnaldo told me some archs could have same addresses
> > for data and functions.. will check ;-)
> >
> > jirka
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > index d9d86c6..be6d7cf 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > @@ -1220,6 +1220,10 @@ static void ip__resolve_data(struct machine *machine, struct thread *thread,
> >  
> >  	thread__find_addr_location(thread, machine, m, MAP__VARIABLE, addr,
> >  				   &al);
> > +	if (!al.map)
> > +		thread__find_addr_location(thread, machine, m, MAP__FUNCTION, addr,
> > +					   &al);
> > +
> >  	ams->addr = addr;
> >  	ams->al_addr = al.addr;
> >  	ams->sym = al.sym;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/