Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932355AbaDHQDk (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:03:40 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:46071 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756709AbaDHQDi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:03:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:02:50 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Steven Noonan , Mel Gorman , Cyrill Gorcunov , David Vrabel , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Linux-MM , Linux-X86 , LKML , Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Define _PAGE_NUMA with unused physical address bits PMD and PTE levels Message-ID: <20140408160250.GE31554@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <5342C517.2020305@citrix.com> <20140407154935.GD7292@suse.de> <20140407161910.GJ1444@moon> <20140407182854.GH7292@suse.de> <5342FC0E.9080701@zytor.com> <20140407193646.GC23983@moon> <5342FFB0.6010501@zytor.com> <20140407212535.GJ7292@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org .snip.. > >>> David Vrabel has a patchset which I presumed would be pulled through > >the > >>> Xen tree this merge window: > >>> > >>> [PATCHv5 0/8] x86/xen: fixes for mapping high MMIO regions (and > >remove > >>> _PAGE_IOMAP) > >>> > >>> That frees up this bit. > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, I was not aware of that patch. Based on it, I intend to > >force > >> automatic NUMA balancing to depend on !XEN and see what the reaction > >is. If > >> support for Xen is really required then it potentially be re-enabled > >if/when > >> that series is merged assuming they do not need the bit for something > >else. > >> > > > >Amazon EC2 does have large memory instance types with NUMA exposed to > >the guest (e.g. c3.8xlarge, i2.8xlarge, etc), so it'd be preferable > >(to me anyway) if we didn't require !XEN. What about the patch that David Vrabel posted: http://osdir.com/ml/general/2014-03/msg41979.html Has anybody taken it for a spin? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/