Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757577AbaDHTzn (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:55:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:37745 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756894AbaDHTzh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:55:37 -0400 Message-ID: <53445437.1030902@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:55:35 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Kumar Gala , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error interrupts References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140408153925.GJ30077@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20140408153925.GJ30077@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/08/14 08:39, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 12:57:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> The Krait L1/L2 error reporting hardware is made up a per-CPU >> interrupt for the L1 cache and a SPI interrupt for the L2. >> >> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi >> Cc: Mark Rutland >> Cc: Kumar Gala >> Cc: >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt >> index b90fcc7c53cf..d7357e777399 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cache.txt > Right, that's http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg308540.html > > So whoever picks those patches up, Lorenzo's doc needs to be in his tree > first too. > > How about I review the EDAC part and an arm maintainer picks the whole > series up? Would that be easier, logistically? > That sounds fine if you want to give an ack on the edac changes. I can route it through arm-soc. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/